Our previous installments, Strategic Hospice Revenue Cycle Management and Hospice Billing: How to Build a Clean-Claim Process, established that a healthy revenue cycle is the engine that allows an agency to maintain stability and focus on its clinical mission. However, hospice leadership typically focus more heavily on clinical delivery rather than the financial aspects of the agency. The connection between daily administrative tasks and long-term financial health can sometimes be difficult to see.
Many leaders find that their month-end feels like a period of high volatility rather than a repeatable operating process. To shift to a more predictible financial stance, leadership must transition from merely monitoring bank balances to auditing the upstream processes that dictate the agency’s cash flow.
Hospice leadership to not need to be a billing experts to lead a successful agency. However, it is essential to have a solid understanding of the operational triggers that dictate the agency’s cash flow. To gain an understanding of the agency’s health and whether the agency is running a disciplined or reactive process, leadership can use these seven questions in the next meeting with the revenue cycle manager.
1. The “First-Pass” Health Check
The Question:“What is our first-pass clean claim rate over the last 90 days, and what are the primary reasons for failure?”
Why it matters: A “first-pass” claim is one that is paid by Medicare the very first time the agency submits it. In a healthy agency, this should be above 95%. A high first-pass rate indicates that the intake and clinical teams are providing the billing office with clean, validated data. If the first-pass rate is low, it means the billing team is spending more time “fixing” old errors than processing new revenue. A low first-pass rate means that the billing team is spending more time reworking old claims and fixing old mistakes than processing new revenue.
Leadership needs to know why claims are failing. Is it because intake forms are missing signatures? Is it because the clinical notes don’t match the billing dates? This question tells leadership which department – Intake, Clinical, or Billing – needs more training.
2. The NOE Revenue Leak
The Question:“How many non-covered days did we incur last month due to late or returned NOEs, and what was the specific dollar impact?”
Why it matters: The Notice of Election (NOE) is the most time-sensitive document in hospice. An agency has exactly five calendar days from a patient’s admission to notify Medicare. If the agency misses that window, or if the agency submits it with an error and has to resubmit it late, Medicare will simply refuse to pay for the days the agency cared for the patient prior to the NOE submission date. This is not a “delayed” payment; it is lost revenue that can never be recovered. Thus, unlike most billing errors, Notice of Election (NOE) failures typically result in permanent losses, i.e., “non-reportable” days where care was provided but cannot be reimbursed.
Tracking the dollar amount of these “non-covered days” is the fastest way to see if the agency’s intake process is disciplined. Quantifying the non-covered days in dollars transforms a “paperwork issue” into a tangible loss that requires immediate leadership intervention.
3. Sequential Discipline
The Question:“Are we experiencing out-of-sequence rejections, and if so, what is the root cause?”
Why it matters: Hospice billing is linear. Medicare processes hospice claims in a strict chronological order. An agency cannot successfully bill for a patient’s February services until the patient’s January claim has been processed and paid. This is known as sequential billing. One unclosed transfer, discharge, or revocation can halt the entire chain of claims for a patient.
Sequencing issues usually point to a breakdown in communication between field staff and the office, indicating that patient statuses are not being updated in the EMR in real-time.
If a patient’s status changes – such as a transfer from another agency, a discharge, or a readmission – the paperwork must be finalized in the system with perfect accuracy. If a single status update is forgotten or entered incorrectly, it creates a billing stoppage. Every subsequent month of revenue for that patient is held in “suspense” by Medicare until the prior month is resolved. This question reveals whether the agency’s clinical and office staff are communicating patient status changes in real-time, or if the agency’s billing department is constantly waiting on clinical data to “unlock” the next month’s cash flow.
4. The Eligibility Safety Net
The Question:“What is our 30-day forward-looking tracker for recertifications and Face-to-Face (F2F) deadlines?”
Why it matters: To keep a patient on hospice, a physician must certify their eligibility at specific intervals. For some of these, a “Face-to-Face” visit is legally required. If that visit happens even one day late, the patient’s eligibility is voided for that period, and the claim will be denied. These are unnecessary and preventable revenue lossses.
Hospice leadership should ensure that the team isn’t just reacting to missed deadlines. Instead, the team should be actively managing a calendar of upcoming recertification requirements – proactively tracking patients with upcoming recertifications – to ensure no patient “falls out of compliance.”
5. “Return to Provider” (RTP) Velocity
The Question:“What is our average ‘Time to Correct’ for claims that are Returned to Provider (RTP)?”
Why it matters: Claims are often returned for small technical errors (like a misspelled name or an incorrect ZIP code). While the error might be minor, the impact on cash flow is major. If it takes the billing team five days to notice and fix an error, the agency has effectively added five days to its “Days in AR” (the time it takes to get paid). To keep cash moving, high-performing teams aim to correct and resubmit RTPs within 24–48 hours. A high “time to correct” often indicates that the billing team lacks the necessary support from clinical leadership to resolve documentation gaps.
6. Handoff Accountability
The Question:“If you could fix one upstream process – Intake, Clinical, or Medical Director workflows – to reduce rework, which would it be?”
Why it matters: The answer to this important question gives significant insight into where “administrative friction” can be slowing down a hospice agency’s money. Billing managers often see the “symptoms” of problems that start elsewhere. For example, if the billing manager says they spend hours chasing doctors for signatures, the problem isn’t the billing – it’s the physician’s workflow.
This question breaks down operational silos. It gives the revenue cycle manager permission to identify where “dirty data” originates. Often, a minor adjustment to an admission packet or how a Medical Director receives prompts can eliminate 50% of the billing team’s manual labor.
7. The Close Process
The Question:“What is our documented ‘Month-End Close’ checklist and who owns the accountability for each handoff?”
Why it matters: The “Month-End Close” is the process of finalizing all clinical and financial data so the bills can go out. If clinical notes aren’t finished on time, the biller can’t bill. If the biller is waiting on the director to approve a report, the biller can’t bill. A clear, written checklist ensures that everyone knows their role and how it contributes to the agency’s overall ability to bill on time. Hospice leadership owns the accountability for ensuring that the clinical staff doesn’t treat documentation as an “optional” task; such an approach to documentation can delay the entire agency’s payroll and vendor payments.
When the month-end process is a mystery to everyone but the billing team, the result is process uncertainty and cash flow volatility. A disciplined system relies on a written checklist that defines when clinical notes are due, when statuses must be closed, and when the pre-bill review occurs. Accountability ensures the billing team isn’t held responsible for a clinical manager’s late paperwork.
Why This Matters for Hospice Leadership
By moving from a “scramble” to a “system,” hospice leadership protects the agency’s ability to serve patients. When the revenue cycle is predictable, leadership can stop worrying about whether payroll can be met and can start focusing on the quality of the end-of-life care that the team provides.
In our first installment on Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) – Silent Killers of Hospice Cash Flow (and How to Fix Them) – we discussed why consistent working capital is the foundation of an agency’s operational stability. It impacts staffing levels, vendor relationships, and the leadership’s ability to focus on the clinical mission.
This second installment investigates the “micro-leaks” that disrupt that stability. In hospice, financial volatility rarely stems from a single catastrophic error. More often, it is the result of repeatable administrative defects: claim rejections, late Notice of Election (NOE) filings, and chronic rework that causes accounts to sit unpaid for months.
The Anatomy of a “Clean Claim”
A clean claim is a submission that is reimbursed on the first attempt. Achieving a high first-pass pay rate is not the result of a billing team working overtime at month-end; it is the product of a repeatable system. It requires that every claim is built on accurate election documentation, verified coverage mechanics, and clinically supported eligibility before it ever reaches the billing office.
Most “dirty claims” are caused by three predictable upstream breakdowns:
Incomplete Election Packets: Missing signatures or dates that stall the billing process.
Technical NOE Failures: NOEs that are rejected (RTP) due to data entry errors, pushing the filing past the five-day window.
Sequencing Conflicts: Out-of-order billing cycles caused by uncoordinated patient transfers or discharges.
Establishing Operational Guardrails: The Three Control Points
High-performing agencies do not view billing as a back-office function that happens at the end of the month. Instead, they treat the revenue cycle as a continuous relay where each department is responsible for “passing a clean baton.” To achieve this, leadership must implement specific control points – operational “gates” that stop administrative defects before they can cascade into financial losses.
1. The Intake Gate: Securing the Revenue Foundation
The revenue cycle begins the moment a patient is referred, but the most common “micro-leaks” occur during the handoff from intake to billing. If a patient is admitted with an incomplete election packet, the agency is effectively providing care without a secured promise of reimbursement.
The Leadership Mandate: Leadership must move beyond a “get it in eventually” mindset and establish a Hard Stop Policy. This means defining exactly what constitutes a “Complete Admission.” If a signature is missing or the Notice of Election (NOE) has not been initiated within 24 hours of admission, the process should be flagged for immediate intervention. By treating the intake gate as a non-negotiable requirement, you ensure that 100% of your census is backed by an accepted NOE within the 48-hour window.
2. The Eligibility Gate: Synchronizing Clinical and Financial Data
Hospice is unique because its reimbursement is tied to strict clinical timelines, such as Face-to-Face (F2F) encounters and benefit period recertifications. In many agencies, these clinical requirements are tracked in a silo, only surfacing as a “billing problem” when a claim is held at month-end.
The Leadership Mandate: To protect audit integrity, leadership must insist on a centralized, real-time tracking system that bridges the gap between clinical operations and the billing office. This gate ensures that every patient approaching a certification deadline has a confirmed visit scheduled and a physician signature pending. When clinical leadership and billing work in a synchronized operating rhythm, you eliminate the month-end scramble.
3. The Submission Gate: The Final Quality Review
The final control point occurs just before the claim is transmitted to Medicare. This is the Pre-Bill Review, a methodical check designed to catch “out-of-sequence” errors that frequently lead to Returned to Provider (RTP) status.
The Leadership Mandate: Mandate a “double-check” protocol. The individual responsible for the final submission should verify that the claim sequence is intact and that all discharges or transfers from the prior month have been closed cleanly in the system. By catching technical errors here, rather than waiting for a Medicare rejection, you ensure a steady, predictable flow of cash.
Operational Control Summary
Use the following framework to evaluate your internal discipline and identify where your current “gates” may be failing:
Control Point
Leadership Requirement
Weekly KPI Metric
Intake/Admission
Formal definition of a “complete” packet.
Active patients without an accepted NOE.
Eligibility
Single owner for F2F and Recert tracking.
Patients with deadlines in the next 15 days.
Submission
Mandatory pre-bill sequence check.
Percentage of claims requiring resubmission.
Executive Questions for the Billing Manager
You do not need to be a billing expert to lead the revenue cycle but you do need to ask the right questions to determine if you have a stable system or a constant scramble:
On Performance: What is our “first-pass clean claim rate” for the last 90 days, and what are the top three reasons for rejection?
On NOEs: How many non-payable days did we incur last month due to late or returned NOEs?
On Sequencing: What is the root cause of our out-of-sequence issues? (Is it intake, discharge workflow, or claim timing?)
On Prevention: If you could fix one upstream process to reduce your team’s rework by 50%, which one would it be?
The Result: Predictable Cash Flow
Clean claims are not a “billing achievement”; they are the result of leadership decisions and enforced operating discipline. When NOE acceptance is reviewed daily and eligibility is tracked proactively, avoidable denials drop, and the agency moves toward a truly predictable operating rhythm.
No hospice leader enters this field because they love claims and remittances. Their focus is not hospice cash flow optimization. Hospice leadership’s goal is to ensure a dignified end-of-life journey for patients and families. They work to build an organization that can reliably deliver compassionate care, 24/7, without “behind the scenes” chaos.
However, the operational reality is simple: Clinical excellence requires financial oxygen. Even agencies with a strong census and elite clinical teams can be squeezed by delayed claims, avoidable denials, and a collections process that is only “handled when we have time.” When the revenue cycle lags, it isn’t just a billing issue; it is a threat to the agency’s staffing stability, vendor relationships, and ultimately, the patient experience.
The operational reality is that hospice revenue cycle management is the engine that keeps care moving. This blog is the first in a series designed for hospice leadership who want to move their financial operations from a state of constant triage to a predictable operating rhythm.
The Three Pillars of Hospice Financial KPIs for Leadership
To achieve true hospice cash flow optimization, leadership must move from a reactive to a proactive stance. Confusion in the revenue cycle often stems from a lack of accountability. To effectively manage the pipeline, leadership must distinguish between three distinct functions:
Billing (Accuracy & Compliance): The front-end process of generating clean claims. This includes timely filing of the Notice of Election (NOE). In hospice, a late NOE isn’t just a delay. It can result in non-payable days that can never be recovered.
Collections (Velocity and Resolution): The engine that turns claims into cash. This involves payer-facing follow-up: resolving rejections, correcting errors, and appealing denials. It is not about calling families; it is about holding insurance providers accountable.
Accounts Receivable Management (Visibility and Strategy): The dashboard used to monitor the money the agency has earned but not yet received. Effective AR management allows leadership to see if the agency is waiting on payers or if the team is waiting on itself.
Proactive vs. Reactive Operations
A healthy hospice agency doesn’t just “bill;” it runs a disciplined cycle. The table below can be used to evaluate where an agency currently stands:
Phase
Reactive Agency (At-Risk)
Proactive Agency (High-Performing)
Intake & Election
NOEs filed near the 5-day deadline; high risk of non-payment.
NOEs filed within 24–48 hours; zero “non-payable” days.
Documentation
Clinicians chasing signatures for 30-day-old claims.
“Done in a Day” culture; documentation billing-ready in 72 hours.
Payer Follow-up
Working the “loudest” payer or only the oldest claims.
Automated work queues prioritizing high-dollar and high-probability claims.
Leadership Review
Reviewing AR only when the bank balance feels “tight.”
Weekly KPI reviews that predict cash flow 30 days out.
End Result
Constant Triage: Staff is burnt out and cash is unpredictable.
The biggest threats to an agency usually aren’t dramatic disasters. They are repeatable breakdowns that quietly drain agency bandwidth:
Stalled Clinical Handoffs: A lack of “billing-ready” documentation at the point of care is a primary driver of aging AR. When the billing team is faced with clinical documentation integrity concerns leaving them unable to process a claim due to missing elements, the task is sent back to the clinician. This not only delays payment but also increases the administrative overhead per patient, as the same chart must be touched multiple times before it can be finalized
Preventable Technical Denials: The 5-day filing window for the Notice of Election (NOE) is a critical compliance threshold. If the intake process is not airtight, the agency effectively provides unreimbursable care. These technical denials represent a permanent loss of revenue that cannot be recovered through the appeals process, directly impacting the agency’s bottom line.
Unapplied Cash and Posting Delays: When payments are received but not timely reconciled within the billing system, the accounts receivable data becomes distorted. This “hidden” AR leads leadership to make strategic decisions based on inaccurate financial reports, often resulting in the team chasing resolved items while legitimate denials remain unaddressed.
Unmonitored Medicare Cap Liability: Without a proactive monthly monitoring process, the aggregate cap can become a significant, unforeseen year-end liability. Failing to track the relationship between patient stays and reimbursement levels can lead to a repayment demand that exceeds the agency’s available margins, threatening long-term operational stability.
What “Good” Looks Like: Making RCM Boring
In hospice revenue cycle management, the goal is not heroics. It is predictability. “Good” looks like a billing cadence that is “boring” in the best possible way. It means the work is driven by repeatable, auditable habits rather than last-minute scrambles. When the revenue cycle is boring, leadership meetings can focus on growth and quality rather than “Where is the cash?”
The Executive Dashboard That Leadership Should Trust
Hospice leadership does not need to be a billing experts but they do need a credible set of numbers. Every hospice leader should have weekly visibility into:
Days in AR: Is the agency getting paid faster or slower than last month?
The 90-Day Bucket: What percentage of money is drifting toward a write-off?
Clean Claim Rate: How often is billing right the first time?
Time to Bill: How many days pass between the end of the month and the first claim submission?
Five Actions Leadership Can Immediately Take
Improving the agency’s revenue cycle does not require a total overhaul. Leadership can take action to increase visibility and control starting today:
Designate One Owner: Assign a single individual to own the end-to-end pipeline from “Admission to Cash.”
Audit the Aging: Pull a one-page AR report by payer. If AR over 90 days is >15%, there is likely a process breakdown.
Identify Top 3 Drivers: Ask the team: “What are the three most common reasons claims are being rejected right now?”
Set a “Touch” Rule: Implement a rule that any claim over 45 days must be touched and documented weekly until resolved.
Schedule a 30-Minute Rhythm: Schedule a weekly revenue cycle review. Focus on patterns and removing blockers for the team.
Financial stability is the foundation of compassionate care. By moving from a reactive to a proactive revenue cycle, leadership can ensure that the agency’s focus remains exactly where it belongs: on the patient.
A payer is the company of government agency that pays the provider, i.e., the hospice agency, for the medical service that is administered to the patient.
For most hospice agencies, Medicare is the primary payer for hospice services. See, for example, this study published by Bazell et al., 2019, https://bit.ly/3RS805r. The characteristics of payment vary by payer. As such, an agency should understand the distribution of its revenues and receivables across different payers. In addition to understanding the breakdown of total receivables, the agency should look at distribution of receivables by payer – further broken down by aging bucket.
Expected time to be paid on a claim varies by payer. For example, payment for a Medicare claim is usually received within 14 days of the date the claim is submitted. A claim submitted to a commercial payer will take longer and further varies by the commercial payer. It is important to monitor time until payment is received for each payer. Delay in payment is an opportunity to quickly identify if there is a billing error that needs to be corrected. Or, there may be an opportunity to improve the billing and collection process that will result in an increase in speed of collections.
It is also useful to compare your agency’s metrics to industry standards. Metrics that are worse than industry standards could point to areas of the collections process that could benefit from process improvement.
Aging Accounts Receivables for Medicare and Commercial Payers
The following graph shows aging accounts receivable for the Medicare payer. As we see from the graph, over 90% of the receivables are less than two months old.
In contrast, here we can see the distribution of aging accounts receivable for commercial payers for the same hospice agency.
In contrast to the Medicare accounts receivables, here only 43% of the receivables are less than two months old. 25% of the receivables are between four and eight months old. More significantly, more than 25% of the outstanding receivables are more than 12 months old – a sign that there may be a high number of receivables that may have to be written off.
What is the key takeaway?
Different payers have different payment patters and different rules for timely submission of claims. Hospice agencies need to have a good understanding of the distribution of their claims and the distribution of their outstanding accounts receivable to reduce the likelihood of write-offs.
The age of accounts receivable (AR) is the time that has elapsed from the time the agency delivered the service to the patient until current date. Aging AR is typically grouped into monthly buckets (e.g., 0-30 days, 31-60 days, etc.). Total dollar value of outstanding (aging) AR should be monitored each month, grouped by monthly buckets.
Consider the aging AR in the graph above. The horizontal axis shows different buckets of AR, where Medicare is the payer. “Current” represents dollars outstanding for services rendered within the most recent 30 days. “1 month” is dollars outstanding for services rendered in the most recent 31-60 days, etc. The vertical axis represents the percentage of the total Medicare dollar amounts of AR in each of the aging buckets.
How is the Accounts Receivable Distributed over Aging Buckets?
The high dollar amounts in the the first AR bucket followed by a drastic drop in outstanding AR is typical for the Medicare payer. Most agencies bill on a regular cycle (biweekly or monthly) so the large volume of outstanding AR in the “Current” bucket is mostly comprised of services that have not yet been billed out or have just been billed out to Medicare.
The outstanding AR drops but remains elevated in the “1 month” bucket. The agency is waiting to collect on services for which it has billed. It takes approximately 14 days to receive payment from Medicare. Aging AR is low in all remaining aging buckets. This is because the agency has billed and collected for most of its Medicare AR services.
What is Medicare Timely Filing?
Medicare claims must be filed no later than 12 months from the date services were provided. This includes resubmitting corrected claims that were unable to be processed. Again considering the aging AR in the graph above, note the volume of AR in the 10 month and 11 month aging buckets. AR in these aging buckets may be approaching Medicare’s timely filing deadline. Any claims in these buckets that have not yet been billed to Medicare will be not be able to be billed due to timely filing. The agency should quickly investigate the AR in these buckets.
Most agencies have a greater than 99% collection rate for Medicare AR. There should not be significant Medicare AR that is uncollectible.
In addition to monitoring total dollar value of aging AR, there are other useful classifications and breakdowns of aging AR that should be monitored on a monthly or even weekly basis.
Cookie Consent
We use cookies to improve your experience on our site. By using our site, you consent to cookies.
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests when using Google Tag Manager
1 minute
__utmv
Contains custom information set by the web developer via the _setCustomVar method in Google Analytics. This cookie is updated every time new data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
2 years after last activity
__utmx
Used to determine whether a user is included in an A / B or Multivariate test.
18 months
_ga
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gali
Used by Google Analytics to determine which links on a page are being clicked
30 seconds
_ga_
ID used to identify users
2 years
_gid
ID used to identify users for 24 hours after last activity
24 hours
__utma
ID used to identify users and sessions
2 years after last activity
__utmt
Used to monitor number of Google Analytics server requests
10 minutes
__utmb
Used to distinguish new sessions and visits. This cookie is set when the GA.js javascript library is loaded and there is no existing __utmb cookie. The cookie is updated every time data is sent to the Google Analytics server.
30 minutes after last activity
__utmc
Used only with old Urchin versions of Google Analytics and not with GA.js. Was used to distinguish between new sessions and visits at the end of a session.
End of session (browser)
__utmz
Contains information about the traffic source or campaign that directed user to the website. The cookie is set when the GA.js javascript is loaded and updated when data is sent to the Google Anaytics server
6 months after last activity
_gac_
Contains information related to marketing campaigns of the user. These are shared with Google AdWords / Google Ads when the Google Ads and Google Analytics accounts are linked together.
